Thursday, December 30, 2010

Review: The King's Speech

Yesterday Mom & I had a girls' movie day out.  We'd both been hearing lots of buzz about the new film The King's Speech, starring Colin Firth as Britain's King George VI and Geoffrey Rush, the Australian elocutionist-actor who helped him to overcome his stammer.  The buzz is all true!

To say merely that the film is worthy is an understatement.  The acting, the photography & cinematography, the costuming, the score, the direction all come together to make what could have been a rather pedestrian "feel-good" movie into something really quite extraordinary.

This is a seemingly quiet film with filled surprisingly big moments.

Briefly, the story starts in the years just prior to WWII.  King George V (played by Michael Gambon, of Harry Potter fame) is on the throne and concerned about the succession after his death.  His eldest son Prince Edward (played with uncanny good looks by Guy Pearce) is handsome and charming and has the look of a potentially beloved sovereign, but he is weak and completely besotted with a woman unsuited to be his queen and consort.  Next in line to the throne after his brother is Prince Albert (Colin Firth), called "Bertie" by his family.  He is handsome and athletic, but shy and reserved with a stammer that is nearly incapacitating.  The king strongly encourages Prince Albert to speak in public with disastrous results.  It is the role of a royal, however, to do his duty and many avenues were sought to help him correct his "defect," with little to no success.

The prince had given up hope of ever finding a "cure," until his wife, the Duchess of York (winningly played by Helena Bonham-Carter) found the unorthodox Lionel Logue (Geoffrey Rush).  Naturally, Albert resists Logue's exercises and forced intimacy, but as the need for him to speak more and more looms, he finally gives in and slowly finds success.  It is still a hard road for him, however, and he relapses in critical moments.  First the king dies and his brother succeeds him.  But Edward, now King Edward VIII, is determined to wed the American divorcée Wallis Simpson and is soon forced by the government and the church to abdicate in favor of Albert, who becomes King George VI.  The abdication is not popular, and the new king struggles with a role he had hoped never to attain.  When war with Germany is ultimately declared, it is up to His Majesty to be a strong leader for the country (if in name only).  His address to the nation is his ultimate test!

It was hard not to be reminded of another tour de force royal performance.  Helen Mirren as Queen Elizabeth II was brilliant in showing emotion repressed.  Here Colin Firth must also portray a British monarch's "stiff upper lip," but this is a much more emotional story.  Perhaps with The Queen, the emotion has been repressed over a lifetime that it has become habit.  Perhaps Princess Elizabeth (adorably played by Freya Wilson) and Princess Margaret (an also cute Ramona Marquez) grew up secure in their parents' love, with Lilibet brought up knowing her place in the line of succession.  Prince Albert did not have such security.  He was often sickly, abused and teased, forced to use his right hand over his natural left-handed tendencies.  He had to learn to keep a good face in public, but he seemingly was a good father who loved his girls, he loved and trusted his wife and learned to become good friends with Logue.  I've also read that through the war years he also had a trusted friendship with Winston Churchill (played almost too much as a caricature by Timothy Spall, also of Harry Potter fame).  By all accounts here, he was wary of intimacy, but once he let someone in he was the warmest of companions.  I hope that was true and not just dramatic license.  I would be eager to know if Her Majesty has seen the film and feels it to be accurate at all.

This film is chock full of the best of Britain's acting roster:

Colin Firth does British reserve like no one else.  He is known the world over for a definitive Mr. Darcy, the epitome of English elite.  Here he shows the audience that being King and being human are not mutally exclusive.  All the big moments in the film are his, deservedly so.  I was particularly moved by the scene where he breaks down in front of his new queen, confiding how inadequate he feels to be king.  And the last scene, his big wartime speech to the nation, is as tense as any Hitchcock movie!  Oscar-worthy, no doubt.

Geoffrey Rush's portrayal of Lionel Logue is not unlike some of his other brash, unconventional characters; but he's just as likeable here, with a sense of fun simmering below the surface that you long for Albert to throw caution to the wind and join him for the ride!

Helena Bonham-Carter as Elizabeth, Duchess of York was a welcome change from her usual kooky roles.  Here she is a warm wife, loving mother and quiet but influential force of nature.  She should try this more often!

Michael Gambon is rather known for his crusty roles, and he doesn't disappoint here.  As George V he rules confidently, even in the face of changing technology and society.  He hoped Albert would be king all along, I think, and perhaps that is why he pushed him so hard.  Gambon always commands every scene he's in, and even if there is no Dumbledore twinkle in his eyes, he still conveys a hopeful pride and affection for his son.

It was a joy to see Claire Bloom as the stately Queen Mary, Sir Derek Jacobi as fussy Archibishop Cosmo Lang, the beautiful Jennifer Ehle as Myrtle Logue, David Bamber as a theatre director (that's 3 P&P alums!) and Anthony Andrews as Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin.

Guy Pearce, as I mentioned above, was dashing as King Edward VIII (later the Duke of Windsor), and Eve Best as Wallis Simpson made the most of a small but pivotal role.  Mom & I both felt she really looked the part! (there was a nice shot of a reproduction piece of one of her many jewels)

When I was younger we had a book called Littlest Princesses: The Intimate Story of HRH Princess Elizabeth & HRH Princess Margaret As Told By Their Governess.  When I saw young Freya Wilson and Ramona Marquez as the two young princesses, I thought of that book at once!  I must see if I can find it at Mom & Dad's, as I was so very fond of it!

I'm always glad to see Timothy Spall in the credits of any movie.  His portrayal of Churchill was a little over the top, and he looked more Hitchcock than Churchill.  And yet, the voice was right if the expression was a bit too dour and his stature a bit on the short side.  The Prime Minister was a dynamic personality, and Spall's portrayal certainly conveyed that.


The screenplay itself was very good, though I believe it was the acting that made it outstanding.  The direction, photography and cinematography looked both of another time and yet very crisply current.  The score added much as well, particularly in that last tense speech scene.  The costuming looked period without being fussy.  I did feel a bit badly for the ladies though, as the 1930s wasn't the most stunningly flattering of periods for fashion!  lol!


All in all, I was swept away by this film, and unlike some films my emotions ran the gamut.  I laughed, I cried, I smiled, I cheered (inwardly, of course - this is the Royal Family we're talking about!)... I was simply won over by it.




Picture credit: Colin Firth as King George VI in The King's Speech, Bedlam Productions/The Weinstein Company.
The King's Speech Official Site

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Cultivating Kindness - Part One

I've been thinking about this topic for sometime, and I apologize if it ends up being all over the map when it comes to putting my thoughts down in some coherent form.  This past holiday weekend has been wonderful, and I am reminded even more on such days how grateful I am to have a loving, generous family.  In this gratitude, especially as the end of the year looms, I can't help but ponder why it's so difficult for people to be nice to one another during other times of the year.

Of course, I realize that everyone has his or her trials and burdens; and they can be very difficult to overcome.  I do not make light of that at all.  I have certainly undergone my own trials in this life; and yet... I hope that those burdens or stresses have not allowed me to take my frustration out on others by being rude or hateful or judgmental.  I'm not perfect, and I know that I am bound to have hurt someone's feelings along the way, though it was never my intent.  (I'm really sorry, by the way!)

I am wondering more about our society as a whole allowing incivility and stinginess to prevail over being well-mannered and generous.  When did that get to be okay?  It's demeaning on every level, and no one likes being humiliated.  Not only is it often allowed, it is also accepted... many people believing somehow that they are deserving of such scorn!  How did that happen?

Now I know that when it comes to the psyche there are a lot more issues than having your pigtails tugged in school by a boy who kind of likes you.  Bullying is very real and devastating , and done both by family members and classmates.  As a society we are outraged when we hear of such treatment, especially when it forces the person being bullied to feel they have no other way out but suicide or even homicide.  We only have to watch the myriad of "It Gets Better" videos to know such loss of life touches us.

But there is a subtler kind of intimidation that goes on that is completely condoned... or at least ignored.  We are bombarded by such images and messages each and every day.  Take, for instance, the news... it doesn't matter if it's one of the cable news channels or the local stations, the viewer is subjected to sneering pundits and obnoxious ambulance chasers masquerading as "investigative" reporters.  They purport to be giving us newsworthy information or informing us about the "issues."  I find it to be neither.  Rather we are subjected to intrusive and sometimes ridiculous questioning of individuals taken unaware at their homes and places of business with "Do you still beat your wife" kind of interrogations.  Whether or not the individual is "guilty" of some crime is irrelevant, so long as they are taken by surprise with such tactics.  Honestly, would anyone look innocent with a microphone shoved in one's face and badgered with such questions??  As for the cable news talking heads... what they offer is not news -- it is opinion.  Everyone, of course, has a right to one.  Just don't tell me what I should think - please give me both sides of the issue and let me make up my own mind, thank-you-very-much.

Did I mention I've all but given up watching the news on television?

And TV personalities are not the only ones who foster this offensive dialog (monologue?).  Our public servants are just as bad, hurling insults and using scare tactics to earn our votes - we only have to look at one campaign ad to see how a race is going to be run.  Each side always complains the other side is mud-slinging, but from where I'm sitting it looks like they're both down there wallowing in it.

I could go on giving more examples... the paparazzi... reality television... even Facebook and other internet sites!  Somehow the perception is that it's okay to do or say whatever you want, even if it's hurtful and intrusive or even somewhat dangerous to other people.  It's easy to put the blame on all these things too... these inanimate, faceless institutions.  But Facebook isn't the problem... getting a picture of a celebrity isn't the problem... it's the manner in which those who do these things conduct themselves... without integrity, without concern for the feelings of others, maybe even for one's own feelings?

As I mentioned above, this topic is something I've been considering for some time.  I'm not on a soapbox here, though it may sound like it.  I just want to understand how we got to this place, and why it's okay with people.  Should we let it go?  Can we re-learn civility?  Is being kind a weakness?

How do we cultivate kindness?

Monday, December 27, 2010

New and Improved!

Welcome to the new and improved look of Aibreán's Musings!  It was looking a little stale, and I felt a bit the same way about writing in general, and blogging in particular.  Look for a new blog post soon - maybe even tomorrow!